ANALYSIS OF FACTORS AFFECTING ACCURACY OF GLOBAL
IONOSPHERIC GRID MODEL
1)College of Geomatics,Xi’an University of Science and Technology,Xi’an 710054
2)State Key Laboratory of Geodesy and Earth’s Dynamics,Wuhan 430077
3)School of Geodesy and Geomatics,Wuhan University,Wuhan 430079
Abstract Taking 2012 January data as an example,effect of model order and observation data sampling intervals on global ionospheric modeling time and accuracy of the model,and the correlation between the magnetic field intensity and the accuracy of the model were analized.The results show that the model order and the sampling interval affect greatly modeling time and accuracy of the model,and there is a strong correlation between the geomagnetic intensity and the accuracy of the model.Therefore,reducing model order and sampling rate can greatly reduce the modeling time required duaring the geomagnetic quiet perids.
Key words :
global ionospheric maps
model order
sampling interval
geomagnetic field
accuracy
Received: 17 April 2013
Published: 21 April 2014
Cite this article:
Chen Peng,Chen Jiajun. ANALYSIS OF FACTORS AFFECTING ACCURACY OF GLOBAL
IONOSPHERIC GRID MODEL[J]. jgg, 2014, 34(2): 105-110.
Chen Peng,Chen Jiajun. ANALYSIS OF FACTORS AFFECTING ACCURACY OF GLOBAL
IONOSPHERIC GRID MODEL[J]. jgg, 2014, 34(2): 105-110.
URL:
http://www.jgg09.com/EN/ OR http://www.jgg09.com/EN/Y2014/V34/I2/105
[1]
ZHU Huizhong,ZHANG Xinyang,YANG Hu,TANG Longjiang,LI Jun. Analysis of GEO Satellites on BDS High-Precision Relative Positioning Performance [J]. jgg, 2021, 41(8): 795-799.
[2]
HUANG Lunwen,MENG Xianwei. Accuracy Analysis of Precise Point Positioning Using BDS-3 PPP-B2b Signals [J]. jgg, 2021, 41(5): 516-519.
[3]
WANG Hepeng,GUO Hang,HUANG Cong. Performance Comparison and Analysis of Three Kinds of Multi-System Open Source PPP Software [J]. jgg, 2021, 41(5): 520-524.
[4]
WANG Yupu,XUE Shenhui,WANG Wei,DING Yang,LI Boyu,LIU Fengyu. Effect Analysis of Common Prediction Models Specific to Satellite Clock Bias Based on the Principle of Single Difference Prediction [J]. jgg, 2021, 41(4): 336-341.
[5]
WANG Lijun,JIAO Wenhai,JIA Xiaolin, ZENG Tian,ZHANG Liang. Comparative Analysis of BDS-3 Precise Point Positioning Performance [J]. jgg, 2021, 41(4): 357-361.
[6]
FU Bolin,XIE Shuyu,LI Tao,LI Hao,ZUO Pingping,GAO Ertao. Comparative Study of Landslide Remote Sensing Monitoring Based on SBAS/PS-InSAR Technology [J]. jgg, 2021, 41(4): 392-397.
[7]
WANG Run, WANG Jingli, Lü Dong. Research on the Elman Neural Network Algorithm to Predict Navigation Satellite Clock Bias [J]. jgg, 2021, 41(3): 285-289.
[8]
ZHU Song,MAO Yong,YI Wenting,ZHU Jiasong. Analysis of Positioning Accuracy and Convergence of BDS Precise Point Positioning [J]. jgg, 2021, 41(2): 122-124.
[9]
DU Shi,HUANG Guanwen,GE Yulong, YUE Fan. Performance Evaluation of BNC/RTKLIB/PPPWIZARD Real-Time Precise Point Positioning Service [J]. jgg, 2021, 41(2): 125-130.
[10]
QIAN Wei,YUE Jianping,SHAN Lijie,HAN Chenyu. Accuracy Analysis of Solving Earth Rotation Parameters Based on VLBI Observation Data [J]. jgg, 2021, 41(12): 1245-1248.
[11]
CHEN Kang,HU Zhengwang,DU Jinsong. Research on the Differential Characteristics between ΔT and T ap Using the Global Geomagnetic Field Model [J]. jgg, 2021, 41(11): 1141-1145.
[12]
TAN Hongbo,SHEN Chongyang,HUANG Haozhe,HAO Hongtao,WEI Jin,YANG Guangliang,WANG Jiapei. Typical Gravity Changes before Strong Earthquakes and Numerical Prediction Test [J]. jgg, 2021, 41(11): 1133-1140.
[13]
MO Deli,ZHAO Yinjun,CHEN Guoqing,LIANG Shan,TONG Kai,LIANG Yulian. Research on Adaptive Waveform Re-Tracking Algorithm Based on Main Peak [J]. jgg, 2021, 41(10): 1051-1056.
[14]
GUO Jiabin,JIN Shuanggen. Variations of Tropopause Parameters over China from FY-3C GNSS Radio Occultation Observations [J]. jgg, 2021, 41(1): 21-26.
[15]
MA Xiangtai,ZHONG Shiming,ZHANG Jie,HU Fushuai. Accuracy Analysis of Doppler Velocimetry and Kinematic PPP Velocity Determination with BDS/GPS [J]. jgg, 2021, 41(1): 34-38.