Analysis of Virtual Spherical Harmonic Method Approaching Small Area Elevation Datum
Abstract This paper studies the theory and method of constructing virtual spherical harmonic of municipal geoid. First, we select the center point and radius of the build area. Then, the observed data are preprocessed, and the numerical range and location information of the observed values are statistically analyzed. Secondly, the coordinates of the observed values are transformed from geographic coordinates to spherical crown coordinates, and then to a virtual spherical coordinate system. Finally, the municipal geoid is constructed according to the virtual spherical harmonic method. The polynomial fitting, neural network and virtual spherical harmonic method are used to construct the sampling points in Nanchang city. The results show that the virtual spherical harmonic method has the smallest fitting RMS value, which is only 0.308 cm, and the best effect.
Key words :
virtual spherical harmonics
geoid
approximation
urban level
Nanchang city
Cite this article:
WANG Jianqiang,SUN Yunlong. Analysis of Virtual Spherical Harmonic Method Approaching Small Area Elevation Datum[J]. jgg, 2022, 42(2): 115-118.
WANG Jianqiang,SUN Yunlong. Analysis of Virtual Spherical Harmonic Method Approaching Small Area Elevation Datum[J]. jgg, 2022, 42(2): 115-118.
URL:
http://www.jgg09.com/EN/ OR http://www.jgg09.com/EN/Y2022/V42/I2/115
[1]
LI Mingfei,WU Junchao,QIN Chuan. Analysis and Comparison of Local Quasi Geoid Refinement Model Based on Remove-Restore Method [J]. jgg, 2020, 40(9): 952-956.
[2]
MO Ying, ZHU Yufeng, JIANG Liming, SUN Qishi. Land Subsidence Monitoring of Nanchang Area Based on Sentinel-1A Using Time Series InSAR Technology
[J]. jgg, 2020, 40(3): 270-275.
[3]
WU Xiaofeng,SONG Hao,DAI Xianpeng,FAN Wenhua,SUN Junsong. Gravity Field Variation in Maoshan Area Considering Vertical Strain Rate [J]. jgg, 2019, 39(8): 804-809.
[4]
LIWeichao,ZHANGXingfu,CHENZhiwei,CUIJiawu. Method and Accuracy Analysis of Calculating Deflection of the Vertical Basedon Geoid Mode [J]. jgg, 2019, 39(8): 843-848.
[5]
KUANG Daizhi,FENG Jinkai,LI Wei. Research on Area Quasigeoid/Geoid Determination Based on Semi-Free Point Mass Model [J]. jgg, 2019, 39(10): 1027-1032.
[6]
DONG Mingxu,LI Jiancheng,HUA Liangchun,JIANG Weiping,YIN Haohua,AO Minsi,ZENG Xiangqiang. Hunan 2017 GNSS Gravity Quasi-Geoid Model and Its Precision Analysis [J]. jgg, 2019, 39(1): 66-71.
[7]
LI Jun,OUYANG Mingda,LI Qi. Refinement of Regional Quasi-Geoid Using the EGM2008+DTM2006.0 Model [J]. jgg, 2018, 38(3): 244-248.
[8]
HU Zhengwang,DU Jinsong,CHEN Chao. Indirect Impact of Geoid Undulation on Calculation of International Geomagnetic Reference Field [J]. jgg, 2018, 38(3): 260-262.
[9]
ZHANG Pin,SHEN Chongyang,YANG Guangliang,WANG Tongqing,CHEN zhaohui,ZHANG Shuangxi. Research on the Effect of Geoid Undulation on Gravity Reduction [J]. jgg, 2017, 37(3): 306-310.
[10]
DING Jian,XU Houze,ZHANG Chuanyin. An Approach to Evaluating Earth Gravitational Models (EGM) Based on Gauss-Listing Geoid Definition
[J]. jgg, 2017, 37(1): 5-10.
[11]
LI Feng,ZHANG Shuhong,WANG Hongfei,QUAN Wei. Quasi-Geoid Refinement Algorithm Based on Coons Surface [J]. jgg, 2016, 36(12): 1109-1111.
[12]
WU Yihao,LUO Zhicai. The Effect on Geoid Modeling Caused by Lateral Topographical Density Variation [J]. jgg, 2016, 36(11): 1003-1007.
[13]
LI Shanshan,QU Zhenghao. Effect of Error of Gravity Data on Geoid Determination [J]. jgg, 2016, 36(10): 847-850.
[14]
ZHAI Changzhi,YAO Yibin,YUE Shun. Geoid Refinement Method Based on the Regional EGM2008
and the Remaining Terrain Model [J]. jgg, 2015, 35(6): 941-944.
[15]
ZHAO Dejun,XU Xinqiang,CHEN Yongxiang,LI Shuaixin. Evaluations of the Recent Goce-Based Gravity Field Models [J]. jgg, 2015, 35(2): 322-325.