CONCURRENT FLIGHT TEST OF LaCoste & Romberg(LCR) AIRBORNE GRAVIMETER ⅡAND Ⅰ SYSTEM
Sun Zhongmiao; Zhai Zhenhe; Li Yingchun ;and Xiao Yun
Xi’an Research Institute of Surveying and Mapping, Xi’an 710054
Abstract In order to validate the accuracy and the performance of the LaCoste & Romberg (LCRⅡ), a concurrent flight test over a mountain area was undertaken.The LCR gravimeter Ⅱ and an LCR gravimeter Ⅰ system side by side. The results of the flight test show that the standard deviation of the gravity anomalies difference measured with the two systems is about 4.0×10 -5 ms -2 namely the accuracy of the single system is about 2.8×10 -5 ms -2 if we assumed the two systems have the same accuracy. They also indicate that the standard deviation of the 5′×5′ grid mean gravity anomalies difference from the two systems is about 4.9×10 -5 ms -2 namely the related accuracy of the single system is about 3.5×10 -5 ms -2 and 2.9×10 -5 ms -2 after two outliers were eliminated. In general, LCR gravimeter Ⅱ system has the identical accuracy as the LCR gravimeter Ⅰ system, but it can be quickly leveling off.
Key words :
airborne gravimetry
airborne gravimeter
gravity anomaly
lowpass filter
concurrent flight
Received: 01 January 1900
Corresponding Authors:
Sun Zhongmiao
Cite this article:
Sun Zhongmiao,Zhai Zhenhe,Li Yingchun et al. CONCURRENT FLIGHT TEST OF LaCoste & Romberg(LCR) AIRBORNE GRAVIMETER ⅡAND Ⅰ SYSTEM[J]. , 2012, 32(2): 24-27.
Sun Zhongmiao,Zhai Zhenhe,Li Yingchun et al. CONCURRENT FLIGHT TEST OF LaCoste & Romberg(LCR) AIRBORNE GRAVIMETER ⅡAND Ⅰ SYSTEM[J]. jgg, 2012, 32(2): 24-27.
URL:
http://www.jgg09.com/EN/ OR http://www.jgg09.com/EN/Y2012/V32/I2/24
[1]
XU Rugang, LIANG Xiao, SUN Hongbo, CHU Fei. The Effects of Expanding Edge Length in the Processing of Gravity Anomalies Separation: An Example of Interpolation Cut Method [J]. jgg, 2021, 41(3): 221-228.
[2]
SHE Yawen, FU Guangyu. Estimation of Gravity Anomaly Data Based on Recurrent Neural Network [J]. jgg, 2021, 41(3): 234-237.
[3]
ZHANG Chi,ZHANG Shuangxi,WANG Haihong. Moho Topography of Iran Using Multi-Scale Gravity Analysis and Its Tectonic Implications [J]. jgg, 2020, 40(2): 182-186.
[4]
WU Xiaofeng,SONG Hao,DAI Xianpeng,FAN Wenhua,SUN Junsong. Gravity Field Variation in Maoshan Area Considering Vertical Strain Rate [J]. jgg, 2019, 39(8): 804-809.
[5]
CHEN Ming,FANG Jian,HE Huiyou. Moho Depths of the South China Sea and Adjacent Regions: Results from Gravity Anomaly Data [J]. jgg, 2019, 39(4): 356-360.
[6]
ZHAO Bingjie,YANG Guangliang,LI Zhejun. Study on the Remove-Restore Theory of Refining Gravity Anomaly and Its Application [J]. jgg, 2019, 39(4): 361-365.
[7]
WEI Jiancheng;XIAO Yun;WANG Li;MENG Ning;ZOU Jiasheng. Filtering of Strapdown Marine Gravity Data by Wavelet Threshold [J]. jgg, 2019, 39(11): 1132-1136.
[8]
LIU Dong,SHAO Desheng, WANG Zhimin, MU Baosheng. Precision Analysis of the Measured Gravity Anomaly and Bouguer Gravity Anomaly in the Correction of High-Precision Leveling [J]. jgg, 2018, 38(5): 539-541.
[9]
WEI Jiancheng,XIAO Yun,WANG Li,MENG Ning,ZOU Jiasheng. A New Method for Searching Intersection of Airborne Gravity Survey [J]. jgg, 2018, 38(12): 1302-1305.
[10]
GUO Dong,SUN Zhongmiao,WU Fumei,ZHANG Qi. Comparison and Analysis of Airborne Gravity Disturbance in Different Coordinate Systems [J]. jgg, 2018, 38(10): 1068-1072.
[11]
. [J]. jgg, 2017, 37(增2): 115-122.
[12]
. [J]. jgg, 2017, 37(增2): 128-133.
[13]
. [J]. jgg, 2017, 37(增1): 43-48.
[14]
ZHANG Pin,SHEN Chongyang,YANG Guangliang,WANG Tongqing,CHEN zhaohui,ZHANG Shuangxi. Research on the Effect of Geoid Undulation on Gravity Reduction [J]. jgg, 2017, 37(3): 306-310.
[15]
XU Zhiping,FANG Shengming,LI Deqing,JIANG Lei,YANG Lipu,LI Yiqing. Characteristics of the Crustal Structure in North China Rift-Depression Basin Using Bouguer Gravity Data [J]. jgg, 2017, 37(3): 246-250.