COMPARISON AND INVESTIGATION OF VAV AND ETERNA TIDAL ANALYSIS METHODS
Tian Guie 1) ; Chen Xiaodong 2) ; Sun Heping 2) ; Chen Guang 1) ;Song Lijie 1) ; and Liu Nannan 3)
1)Trafficing and Surveying College of Hebei Polytechnic University, Tangshan 0630092)Key Laboratory of Dynamical Geodesy, Institute of Geodesy & Geophysics, CAS, Wuhan 4300773)Industrial Development Reform Bureau of Caofeidian,Tangshan 063200
Abstract The drift model,regression factor of airpressure and disturbance eliminating of VAV and ETERNA tide analysis methods are compared and studied theoretically. Then further,the data observed with superconducting gravimeters at Wuhan station are analyzed by use of these two relevant softwares,we can get smaller stand deciation after interation from VAV than ETERNA method, but the differences between the analyzed value and the theoretical amplitude factor is at the same level.
Key words :
VAV tide analysis method
ETERNA tide analysis method
drift model
disturbance data
iteration
Received: 01 January 1900
Corresponding Authors:
Tian Guie
Cite this article:
Tian Guie ,Chen Xiaodong ,Sun Heping et al. COMPARISON AND INVESTIGATION OF VAV AND ETERNA TIDAL ANALYSIS METHODS[J]. , 2009, 29(2): 96-99.
Tian Guie ,Chen Xiaodong ,Sun Heping et al. COMPARISON AND INVESTIGATION OF VAV AND ETERNA TIDAL ANALYSIS METHODS[J]. jgg, 2009, 29(2): 96-99.
URL:
http://www.jgg09.com/EN/ OR http://www.jgg09.com/EN/Y2009/V29/I2/96
[1]
HE Chengwen,YUAN Yunbin,TAN Bingfeng. An Iterative Least Squares Algorithm Based on UWB TDOA Positioning Model [J]. jgg, 2021, 41(8): 806-809.
[2]
ZHAI Xinyi,PAN Guangyong,CHEN Yang,LIU Guolin. L-Curve Characteristic Value Correction Iteration Method for SBAS-InSAR Deformation Inversion [J]. jgg, 2021, 41(4): 403-407.
[3]
LIU Yajing, WANG Chengcong, LIU Mingyue. Study on Improved Local Polynomial Interpolation Weight Function [J]. jgg, 2020, 40(7): 726-729.
[4]
CHEN Qiang,YUE Dongjie,CHEN Jian. Laser LiDAR Point Cloud Registration Algorithm Based on Feature Space Matching [J]. jgg, 2020, 40(12): 1303-1307.
[5]
ZHOU Lixin,WANG Zhiwei. Robust Method for Resolving 3-D Surface Deformation from Multi-LOS D-InSAR Technology [J]. jgg, 2020, 40(12): 1263-1267.
[6]
ZHANG Chongjun,XU Yezhang,ZHENG Shanxi,ZHENG Jiagen,ZHANG Yan. Improved Weight Iterative Closet Point Algorithm Applied in Point Cloud Registration [J]. jgg, 2019, 39(4): 417-420.
[7]
WU Guangming, LU Tieding. Ridge Estimation Iterative Method for Illness Data Processing [J]. jgg, 2019, 39(2): 178-183.
[8]
LIU Bingshi, ZOU Xiancai. Comparison and Analysis of GRACE Time-Varying Signal Recovery Methods [J]. jgg, 2019, 39(2): 204-209.
[9]
JIANG Pan;YOU Wei. The Improved Iteration Method by Correcting Characteristic Value for Transformation of Three-Dimensional Coordinates Based on Large Rotation Angle and Quaternions [J]. jgg, 2019, 39(11): 1182-1187.
[10]
KUANG Daizhi,FENG Jinkai,LI Wei. Research on Area Quasigeoid/Geoid Determination Based on Semi-Free Point Mass Model [J]. jgg, 2019, 39(10): 1027-1032.
[11]
LIU Jinzhao,ZHU Lütao,ZHANG Shuangxi,CHEN Zhaohui,WANG Tongqing,WANG Yong,WANG Yan,ZHU Chuandong,ZHANG Pin. Gravity Anomalies Vertical Separation at Different Depths by an Improved 2D Polynomial Fitting and Weighting Iterative Algorithm [J]. jgg, 2018, 38(9): 897-902.
[12]
YANG Yihui,ZOU Jingui,LI Qin,HAN Yakun. The Application of Selecting Weight Iteration for Semiparametric Regression Model in Landslide Prediction [J]. jgg, 2018, 38(8): 846-850.
[13]
LU Tieding, ZHU Guohong. Algorithms for Adjustment Model with Uncertainty Based on F-Norm [J]. jgg, 2018, 38(6): 557-561.
[14]
ZHU Guohong,LU Tieding. Iterative Algorithm for Adjustment Model with Part Uncertainty [J]. jgg, 2017, 37(9): 968-972.
[15]
WANG Qisheng. The New Algorithm for Multivariate Weighted Total Least Squares [J]. jgg, 2017, 37(12): 1281-1284.