DEFORMATION ANOMALY ANALYSIS AT HUZHOU SEISMOSTATION
BEFORE M 4.9 GAOYOU-BAOYING EARTHQUAKE
1)Huzhou Seismostation ,Earthquake Administration of Zhejiang Province, Huzhou 313000
2)Key Laboratory of Earthquake Geodesy, Institute of Seismology, CEA, Wuhan 430071
Abstract The significant abnormal trends of deformation observations were found at the Huzhou seismostation before the M4.9 GaoyouBaoying earthquake. By combining the deformation data with the focal mechanism solution, the results show that the direction of the anomaly is consistent with the direction of background stress field of this area. The observed deformation anomalies are likely to reflect the changes in tectonic stress field.
Key words :
M 4.9 Gaoyou-Baoying earthquake
Huzhou Seismostation
deformation observation
anomaly
regional tectonic stress field
Received: 27 February 2013
Published: 25 September 2013
Cite this article:
Fang Yanxun,Ma Wugang. DEFORMATION ANOMALY ANALYSIS AT HUZHOU SEISMOSTATION
BEFORE M 4.9 GAOYOU-BAOYING EARTHQUAKE[J]. jgg, 2013, 33(Supp.1): 76-78.
Fang Yanxun,Ma Wugang. DEFORMATION ANOMALY ANALYSIS AT HUZHOU SEISMOSTATION
BEFORE M 4.9 GAOYOU-BAOYING EARTHQUAKE[J]. jgg, 2013, 33(Supp.1): 76-78.
URL:
http://www.jgg09.com/EN/ OR http://www.jgg09.com/EN/Y2013/V33/ISupp.1/76
[1]
WEI Jin,Lü Pinji,HAO Hongtao,WANG Jianwei,LI Ning,HU Minzhang. Study on the Anomalies of the Double Frequency Microseisms before Yingcheng MS 4.9 Earthquake [J]. jgg, 2022, 42(1): 88-95.
[2]
YANG Jianwen,YE Beng,CHEN Jia,GAO Qiong,WANG Jun. GNSS Continuous Observation Short-Term Anomaly Index Extraction and Effectiveness Evaluation in Yunnan Area [J]. jgg, 2021, 41(9): 973-978.
[3]
HUANG Qijin,CUI Qinggu. Research on Resolution Selection of Water Temperature Sensor and Observation Methods Based on Earthquake Cases and Experiments [J]. jgg, 2021, 41(6): 655-660.
[4]
ZHAO Zhichuang,ZHANG Yan,ZHAO Ying. Recognition Analysis on Anomalous Characteristics of Imminent Earthquake——Taking Wenchuan Earthquake as an Example [J]. jgg, 2021, 41(5): 544-549.
[5]
LI Lei,ZHANG Ning,YIN Shuhui,WANG Yizhuo. ARMA Residual Correction Model for Detecting Ionospheric TEC Anomalies before Menyuan MS 6.4 Earthquake [J]. jgg, 2021, 41(4): 382-386.
[6]
XU Rugang, LIANG Xiao, SUN Hongbo, CHU Fei. The Effects of Expanding Edge Length in the Processing of Gravity Anomalies Separation: An Example of Interpolation Cut Method [J]. jgg, 2021, 41(3): 221-228.
[7]
SHE Yawen, FU Guangyu. Estimation of Gravity Anomaly Data Based on Recurrent Neural Network [J]. jgg, 2021, 41(3): 234-237.
[8]
CHEN Kang,HU Zhengwang,DU Jinsong. Research on the Differential Characteristics between ΔT and T ap Using the Global Geomagnetic Field Model [J]. jgg, 2021, 41(11): 1141-1145.
[9]
DAI Miao,FENG Zhisheng,LIU Jian,LI Hongyu,YUAN Guiping. Comprehensive Analysis of Electromagnetic Data before Tangshan M5.1 Earthquake in July 2020 [J]. jgg, 2021, 41(11): 1146-1151.
[10]
XIE Ting,CHEN Biyan,KUANG Cuilin. Study of Ionospheric Anomaly Detection Method Combining PCA and Sliding Time Window [J]. jgg, 2021, 41(10): 1085-1094.
[11]
LIU Xiaoxiang,GAO Ertao,LUO Yi,FU Bolin. Analysis of Coordinate Time Series of CMONOC GNSS Fiducial Stations Using Principal Component Analysis [J]. jgg, 2021, 41(1): 43-48.
[12]
AISA Yisimayili,MAO Zhiqiang,CHEN Jiehong. Evaluation of the 2017 M6.6 Jinghe Earthquake EpicenterBased on the Parkinson Vector [J]. jgg, 2021, 41(1): 74-78.
[13]
. [J]. jgg, 2020, 40(S3): 11-17.
[14]
. [J]. jgg, 2020, 40(S3): 104-108.
[15]
. [J]. jgg, 2020, 40(S3): 24-27.