Seismic Data Prediction Based on Regression Model of Nuclear Mixed Effects
Abstract Aiming at the difficulty of accurate prediction of seismic observation data, we propose a regression model based on nuclear mixed effects. In order to verify the feasibility of the algorithm model, we perform a simulation experiment with the output data of the geophysical instrument of the Hubei Seismic Station and compare it with the traditional neural network algorithm. The results show that the model can accurately predict the seismic and geophysical observation data and the performance is better than other neural network algorithms. The relative error of the water temperature and water level data prediction is less than 0.05% and 0.48%. The proposed model provides a new research idea for earthquake monitoring and forecasting personnel to accumulate and analyze basic earthquake data. At the same time, it also provides practical foundation and research possibilities for more complex deep learning algorithm framework models.
Key words :
nuclear mixed effects model
seismic data prediction
neural network
artificial intelligence
deep learning
Cite this article:
ZHOU Yang. Seismic Data Prediction Based on Regression Model of Nuclear Mixed Effects[J]. jgg, 2021, 41(9): 967-972.
ZHOU Yang. Seismic Data Prediction Based on Regression Model of Nuclear Mixed Effects[J]. jgg, 2021, 41(9): 967-972.
URL:
http://www.jgg09.com/EN/ OR http://www.jgg09.com/EN/Y2021/V41/I9/967
[1]
SUN Wei,ZHU Mingchen. Study on Modeling of Tropospheric Zenith Delay in China with BP-Adaboost Strong Predictor [J]. jgg, 2022, 42(1): 35-40.
[2]
TANG Jun,LI Yinjian,ZHONG Zhengyu,GAO Xin. Prediction Model of Ionospheric TEC by EOF and LSTM Neural Network [J]. jgg, 2021, 41(9): 911-915.
[3]
XUAN Jianhao,CHEN Zhiwei,ZHANG Xingfu,LIANG Chenghao,WU Bo. Combining GRACE and GRACE-FO to Derive Terrestrial Water Storage Changes in the Yangtze River Basin from 2002 to 2020 [J]. jgg, 2021, 41(9): 961-966.
[4]
HUANG Jiawei,LU Tieding,HE Xiaoxing,LI Wei. Short Term Prediction Model of Ionospheric TEC Based on Residual Correction of Prophet-Elman [J]. jgg, 2021, 41(8): 783-788.
[5]
LU Tieding,HUANG Jiawei,HE Xiaoxing,Lü Kaiyun. Short-Term Ionospheric TEC Prediction Using EWT-Elman Combination Model [J]. jgg, 2021, 41(7): 666-671.
[6]
PENG Zhao,SHAO Yongqian,LI He,LIU Lintao. Research on Seismic Detection Based on Machine Learning with Small Sample [J]. jgg, 2021, 41(7): 765-770.
[7]
LU Zhaoxing, Lü Zhifeng, LI Ting, ZHANG Jinsheng, YAO Yao. Forecasting of the Variable Geomagnetic Field Based on BP Neural Network [J]. jgg, 2021, 41(3): 229-233.
[8]
SHE Yawen, FU Guangyu. Estimation of Gravity Anomaly Data Based on Recurrent Neural Network [J]. jgg, 2021, 41(3): 234-237.
[9]
HUANG Wenxi, ZHU Fuying, ZHAI Dulin, LIN Jian, QING Yun, LI Xinxing, YANG Jian. Comparative Analysis of BP Neural Network and ARMA Model in Short-Term Prediction of Mid-Latitude TEC [J]. jgg, 2021, 41(3): 262-267.
[10]
WANG Run, WANG Jingli, Lü Dong. Research on the Elman Neural Network Algorithm to Predict Navigation Satellite Clock Bias [J]. jgg, 2021, 41(3): 285-289.
[11]
YANG Heng,YUE Jianping,XING Yin,ZHOU Qinkun. Research on Dam Deformation Prediction Based on Deep Fully Connected Neural Network [J]. jgg, 2021, 41(2): 162-166.
[12]
LIU Bei,REN Dong. The Study of GNSS-PWV Prediction Based on Wavelet Transform and RBF Neural Network [J]. jgg, 2021, 41(12): 1216-1218.
[13]
FAN Kexian,LI Heng,ZHANG Yi. Evaluation of Earthquake Liquefaction-Induced Lateral Spread Based on RBFNN [J]. jgg, 2021, 41(12): 1271-1275.
[14]
LUAN Yuanzhong,LIANG Yaodong,DONG Yue,WENG Liyuan。LIU Chengxu. Chaotic Characteristics Recognition and Neural Network Prediction of Bridge Horizontal Displacement Analysis [J]. jgg, 2021, 41(1): 7-11.
[15]
XIE Shaofeng,ZHAO Yun,LI Guohong,ZHOU Zhihao,HUANG Liangke. Prediction of PM2.5 Concentration Based on WPA-WOA-BP Neural Network [J]. jgg, 2021, 41(1): 12-16.