Source Parameters and Seismogenic Structure Analysis of the July 12, 2020 Tangshan MS 5.1 Earthquake
Abstract Based on seismic data provided by Hebei regional seismic network, we use the CAP waveform inversion method to obtain the focal mechanism of the July 12, 2020 Tangshan MS5.1 earthquake. In order to get a more accurate focal depth, we employ the depth phase sPL fitting method to measure the focal depth. The results show the parameters of the focal mechanism solution of the mainshock are strike 143°, dip 83°, rake -14° for the nodal planeⅠ, strike 235°, dip 76°, rake -173° for the nodal plane Ⅱ, and centroid depth is 14 km. The result of the focal depth is 14 km by sPL phase method, which is the same as that measured by the methods of CAP. Combined with distribution of earthquake sequence, the seismic intensity map, tectonic setting and deep seismic reflection profiles, we conclude that the nodal plane Ⅱ is the seismogenic fault plane of this earthquake and the Tangshan-Guye fault is the control fault.
Key words :
Tangshan MS 5.1 earthquake
focal mechanism
sPL phase
seismogenic structure
Cite this article:
ZHOU Yi,WANG Xiang,SUN Lina. Source Parameters and Seismogenic Structure Analysis of the July 12, 2020 Tangshan MS 5.1 Earthquake[J]. jgg, 2022, 42(2): 172-175.
ZHOU Yi,WANG Xiang,SUN Lina. Source Parameters and Seismogenic Structure Analysis of the July 12, 2020 Tangshan MS 5.1 Earthquake[J]. jgg, 2022, 42(2): 172-175.
URL:
http://www.jgg09.com/EN/ OR http://www.jgg09.com/EN/Y2022/V42/I2/172
[1]
YIN Weiwei,ZHANG Hui. Using Focal Mechanism to Distinguish Types of Earthquake Events in Shanxi [J]. jgg, 2021, 41(8): 846-852.
[2]
ZHUANG Wenquan,LI Jun,HAO Ming,CUI Duxin. Study on the Characteristics of Current Crustal Activity in the Southern Sichuan-Yunnan Block Using Dense GNSS Data and Focal Mechanism Solution [J]. jgg, 2021, 41(7): 732-738.
[3]
CHEN Chuang,WEI Zigen,LI Wei,GAO Jinzhe,JIANG Hui. Analysis of Seismogenic Focal Mechanism and Seismic Parameter of Songyuan MS 5.1 Earthquake on May 18, 2019 [J]. jgg, 2021, 41(6): 584-588.
[4]
FENG Bing,LI Yang,WANG Wentao,YANG Yingzhao,WEN Yulong,LIU Shu. Study on the Relationship between the Distribution of Tectonic Stress Field and the Shape of Benioff Zone from Japan to Northeast China [J]. jgg, 2021, 41(4): 425-431.
[5]
WU Haibo,CHEN Junhua,WANG Jie. Discussion of the Sequence and Seismogenic Structure of Yingcheng MS 4.9 Earthquake on 2019-12-26 [J]. jgg, 2021, 41(4): 419-424.
[6]
YANG Yanming,HU Bo,DAI Yong,ZHANG Xiaoyan. Research on Focal Mechanism and Seismogenic Structure of 2020-01-23 Shiqu MS 4.3 Earthquake in Sichuan Province [J]. jgg, 2021, 41(2): 167-172.
[7]
LU Zhen,GUO Zhi,HUANG Weiliang,ZHANG Pei,LI Jun,ZHANG Yuanyuan. Analysis on the Source Parameters and Seismogenic Structures of 2009 Shaanxi Gaoling ML 4.8 Earthquake [J]. jgg, 2021, 41(11): 1157-1162.
[8]
ZHOU Lin,LI Jun, ZHANG Pei,JIN Yuan. Study on Fault Structure and Stress Field Characteristics of Maqin-Maqu Section of East Kunlun Fault [J]. jgg, 2021, 41(1): 62-66.
[9]
CHEN Junlei,ZHOU Qingyun, LIU Feng,ZHANG Tianji,YANG Liwei,ZHAO Kun. Comparison of Mechanism Inversion Methods Using Regional Waveform [J]. jgg, 2021, 41(1): 79-82.
[10]
. [J]. jgg, 2020, 40(S1): 47-50.
[11]
. [J]. jgg, 2020, 40(S1): 98-100.
[12]
. [J]. jgg, 2020, 40(S1): 54-56.
[13]
LI Juan,HAN Xiaoming,ZHANG Fan. Research on the Tectonic Stress Field before and after the April 15,2015 Alxa Left Banner MS 5.8 Earthquake [J]. jgg, 2020, 40(9): 923-927.
[14]
ZHANG Fan,WANG Xiaoshan,NA Renhua,HAN Xiaoming,LI Juan,ZHANG Ke. Inversion of Tectonic Stress Field in Eastern Inner Mongolia by Focal Mechanism [J]. jgg, 2020, 40(8): 771-777.
[15]
TANG Lanrong, ZENG Xinfu,LUO Li,LI Bin1 Lv Jian. Characteristics of Focal Mechanisms and Apparent Stress in Xunwu and Its Adjacent Area
[J]. jgg, 2020, 40(8): 778-782.