Comparative Analysis of Superconducting Gravimeter Calibration Factor Results between A10 and FG5
Abstract Using least squares and iterative algorithms for 5 d simultaneous co-location comparison observations at Anqiu seismic station, we process the data of A10-057 absolute gravimeter, FG5-265 absolute gravimeter and superconducting gravimeter(iGrav). The final calibration factor factors of FG5-265 and A10-057 precision measurement iGrav-053 are -883.929 4 ns-2/V and -884.134 ns-2/V, respectively, and the calibration accuracy is 0.048 26% and 0.093 7%, which are better than 0.1%. At the same time, we compare the differences between the calibration work of FG5-265 and A10-057 in terms of various measurement indexes and the selected measurement logarithms on the calibration results, and exemplify the requirements of calibration factor for multiple scenarios, which finally proves that the A10 model absolute gravimeter has the capability of calibrating relative gravimeters and provides a reference for the subsequent calibration of relative gravimeters.
Key words :
calibration factor
iGrav-053
FG5-265
A10-057
precision analysis
Cite this article:
ZHOU Hao,LIU Ziwei,ZHANG Xiaotong et al. Comparative Analysis of Superconducting Gravimeter Calibration Factor Results between A10 and FG5[J]. jgg, 2024, 44(6): 601-605.
ZHOU Hao,LIU Ziwei,ZHANG Xiaotong et al. Comparative Analysis of Superconducting Gravimeter Calibration Factor Results between A10 and FG5[J]. jgg, 2024, 44(6): 601-605.
URL:
http://www.jgg09.com/EN/ OR http://www.jgg09.com/EN/Y2024/V44/I6/601
[1]
GAO Mingzhi, ZHANG Cen, HAO Ran, WANG Huasheng, CHEN Jian. Analysis of Abnormal Changes of Volumetric Strain before and after Pingyuan M5.5 Earthquake [J]. jgg, 2024, 44(6): 643-647.
[2]
LAN Minyi, GAO Chengfa. Analysis of Relative Positioning Based on Self-Established Base Station Using Smartphones [J]. jgg, 2024, 44(5): 468-472.
[3]
DU Xiangfeng, WEI Dehong. Inversion and Accuracy of the SWARM Time-Variable Gravity by SWARM Satellites [J]. jgg, 2023, 43(12): 1240-1245.
[4]
TAN Xiaorong,XU Jiangning,HE Hongyang,CHEN Ding,LIANG Yifeng,WU Miao. Optimized Initial Condition of GM(1,1) Model and Its Application in GNSS Clock Offset Prediction [J]. jgg, 2022, 42(9): 919-924.
[5]
WANG Run, WANG Jingli, Lü Dong. Research on the Elman Neural Network Algorithm to Predict Navigation Satellite Clock Bias [J]. jgg, 2021, 41(3): 285-289.
[6]
GUO Jiabin,JIN Shuanggen. Variations of Tropopause Parameters over China from FY-3C GNSS Radio Occultation Observations [J]. jgg, 2021, 41(1): 21-26.
[7]
MA Xiangtai,ZHONG Shiming,ZHANG Jie,HU Fushuai. Accuracy Analysis of Doppler Velocimetry and Kinematic PPP Velocity Determination with BDS/GPS [J]. jgg, 2021, 41(1): 34-38.
[8]
. [J]. jgg, 2020, 40(增2): 9-12.
[9]
LI Hongda,ZHANG Xianyun,WANG Xiaohong,ZOU Guangqian. Model Establishment and Accuracy Analysis of Atmospheric Weighted Mean Temperature in Guizhou Region
[J]. jgg, 2020, 40(5): 496-501.
[10]
WANG Jinfang,YANG Ling. Global Assessment on GNSS Single Point Positioning Accuracy Impacted by Tropospheric Delay [J]. jgg, 2020, 40(11): 1194-1199.
[11]
CUI Jinye,MA Xiaping,LIU Xiaopeng. Weighted Mean Temperature Models with Vertical Adjustment for Hong Kong Region [J]. jgg, 2020, 40(10): 1022-1026.
[12]
ZHAO Xingwang,GE Yulong. Accuracy Analysis of Real-Time GPS/Galileo Precise Point Positioning [J]. jgg, 2019, 39(8): 816-820.
[13]
LIWeichao,ZHANGXingfu,CHENZhiwei,CUIJiawu. Method and Accuracy Analysis of Calculating Deflection of the Vertical Basedon Geoid Mode [J]. jgg, 2019, 39(8): 843-848.
[14]
DONG Mingxu,LI Jiancheng,HUA Liangchun,JIANG Weiping,YIN Haohua,AO Minsi,ZENG Xiangqiang. Hunan 2017 GNSS Gravity Quasi-Geoid Model and Its Precision Analysis [J]. jgg, 2019, 39(1): 66-71.
[15]
YAN Chao,FANG Xinjian,LIU Yang,XU Wei,DU Wenxuan,WANG Tao,ZHANG Guanghan. Precision Analysis of GPS/BDS Dual-Frequency Single Epoch Short Baseline Solution in Signal Shadowed Regions [J]. jgg, 2018, 38(7): 679-683.